Skip to main content

The HARROWING Botched Female Garrote Execution: The New “Humane” Machine TORTURED Maria Martinez Before Thousands — The Agonizing 20-Minute Nightmare

EXTREMELY SENSITIVE CONTENT – 18+ ONLY

This article discusses a botched garrote execution of Maria Martinez – a woman sentenced to death for poisoning in 19th century Spain. The content is intended solely for educational and historical documentation purposes, to provide insight into execution methods of that era, potential technical failures, and their consequences. It is not meant to be gratuitously shocking, to glorify violence, or to advocate for any form of execution.

The Female Garrote Execution That Went VERY Wrong

Background: Maria Martinez and the Crime

Image

 

Maria Martinez was a Spanish woman sentenced to death in the mid-19th century for poisoning. According to court records from that period, she was accused of using poison to kill her husband or a family member to inherit property – a serious crime under Spanish criminal law at the time.

The court sentenced her to death by garrote – a traditional Spanish execution method used since the 18th century, designed to strangle and/or break the victim’s neck. By the mid-19th century, Spanish authorities were testing a “new” mechanical garrote version believed to be more humane, using a sharp iron screw (garrote screw) intended to pierce the spinal cord to cause rapid death with less pain compared to the older manual garrote.

The Execution Date and The Horrific Malfunction

Image

 

Maria Martinez’s execution took place publicly in a town square (the exact location remains disputed among archival sources, but is often recorded in either Andalusia or Catalonia).

She was led before the crowd, hands tied behind her back, and seated on the garrote chair.
The executioner placed the iron collar around her neck and began turning the screw according to the new mechanism.

 

The machine’s goal was for the sharp iron point to pierce directly into the spinal cord at the cervical vertebrae, causing instant paralysis and rapid death.

However, the new garrote machine did not function as intended:

The iron point did not penetrate the correct spinal cord location but struck off-target, causing severe injury without immediate death.

Maria Martinez suffered intense pain, convulsed, and screamed for several minutes.

The executioner had to turn the screw multiple times, adjusting the position, but still could not achieve the intended effect.

Ultimately, she endured a prolonged strangulation process combined with a penetrating wound, resulting in a death that was more painful and prolonged than the traditional garrote.

According to contemporary witnesses (newspapers and archived correspondence), the scene caused panic and horror among many in the crowd. Some reports indicate she remained conscious for several minutes after the machine was activated.

 

Why Did the New Garrote Machine Fail?

The “improved” garrote technology of that era was still crude and had not been adequately tested on human subjects.

The executioner may have lacked experience operating the new machine.
Individual anatomical differences made it easy for the iron point to miss the spinal cord.

The incident quickly became a scandal, contributing to growing criticism of the garrote method and fueling debates about “humane execution” across 19th-century Europe.

Aftermath

Image

 

The botched execution of Maria Martinez became one of the defining examples of the dangers of implementing unrefined execution technology.

Following the incident, some Spanish provinces temporarily reverted to using manual garrotes or hanging instead of the new mechanical garrote.

The story remains referenced in Spanish legal history as evidence of the brutality and inadequacies of the penal system of that era.

 

The garrote execution of Maria Martinez was not only a technical failure but also became a symbol of the horror of “improved” execution methods that were not yet mature. Instead of a swift and less painful death as intended by its design, she suffered a prolonged and agonizing death before a public crowd. It serves as a reminder that behind “advancements” in the criminal justice system, there sometimes lies hidden cruelty and fatal error.

Main Sources:

19th-century Spanish court and newspaper archives (El Imparcial, La Época)
“Historia de la Pena de Muerte en España” – Spanish legal history studies
“The Garrote in Spain” – documents from the Spanish Institute of Judicial History
Contemporary reports on the Maria Martinez execution (circa 1850s–1870s, depending on specific source)